Products

Products

Anhui Liwei Chemical Co., Limited.

3M Solar Encapsulant EVA Film EVA9110T

    • Product Name: 3M Solar Encapsulant EVA Film EVA9110T
    • Factroy Site: Lingwu, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
    • Price Inquiry: sales2@liwei-chem.com
    • Manufacturer: Anhui Liwei Chemical Co., Limited.
    • CONTACT NOW
    Specifications
    HS Code 710383
    Manufacturer 3M
    Product Name 3M Solar Encapsulant EVA Film EVA9110T
    Product Type Solar encapsulant EVA film
    Material Ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer
    Application Photovoltaic module encapsulation
    Appearance Transparent/clear
    Form Roll film
    Nominal Thickness 0.45 mm
    Density 0.94 g/cm³
    Vinyl Acetate Content 33%
    Melt Flow Rate 25 g/10 min
    Light Transmittance >91%
    Tensile Strength >18 MPa
    Elongation At Break >500%
    Adhesion To Glass >80 N/cm
    Adhesion To Backsheet >40 N/cm
    Gel Content After Cure >80%
    Curing Temperature 150°C
    Curing Time 10 min
    Volume Resistivity >1 × 10^15 Ω·cm
    Dielectric Breakdown Strength >20 kV/mm
    Storage Temperature 5–30°C
    Shelf Life 12 months

    As an accredited 3M Solar Encapsulant EVA Film EVA9110T factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.

    Packing & Storage
    Packing
    Shipping
    Storage
    Application of 3M Solar Encapsulant EVA Film EVA9110T

    In monofacial crystalline silicon module production, 3M EVA9110T is placed as the front encapsulant between low-iron tempered patterned solar glass and the solar cell string and as the rear encapsulant between the cell string and a weather-resistant backsheet. The qualification envelope for this construction is anchored by IEC 61215-1:2021 with MQT 11 thermal cycling -40°C to +85°C, MQT 13 damp heat 85°C/85% RH/1000 h, and MQT 12 humidity-freeze cycles, while safety certification follows IEC 61730-1:2023 and North American installations require UL 1703 or UL 61730. Material compliance for the film itself is documented under REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 and RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU. The layup specification uses 0.46 mm EVA on the glass side and 0.50 mm EVA on the backsheet side; at a typical film density of 0.96 g/cm³, the front film consumption is approximately 442 g/m² and the rear film consumption is 480 g/m². The front film is cut to 100.5–103.0% of the lamination area, and the rear film is held 10–15 mm beyond the outer busbar-to-cell matrix to ensure edge encapsulation without exceeding 3 mm of post-lamination bleed.

    The downstream production sequence starts with cell stringing and bussing, followed by layup in a climate-controlled room maintained at 20–25°C and 40–60% RH. Film rolls are conditioned for 24 h at room temperature before cutting; if the film has been exposed to humidity above 60% RH for more than 4 h, pre-drying at 45°C for 8–12 h in a dehumidified cabinet is required to prevent hydrolysis of the silane adhesion promoter and void formation at the cell/backsheet interface. Lamination is performed on a multi-chamber vacuum laminator with oil-heated platens and an upper silicone membrane. The chamber is evacuated to 0.8–1.0 mbar within 4–5 min; once the module surface temperature reaches 135–140°C, membrane pressure is applied at 0.03–0.05 MPa. The cure hold is maintained for 10–14 min above 145°C module temperature; production validation checks the crosslink density by extraction in xylene per ASTM D2765-16, targeting gel content of 78–92%. Post-lamination cooling to below 60°C before frame attachment prevents backsheet delamination and edge curl.

    Observed process failure modes include cell misalignment caused by film shrinkage in machine direction, rear edge bleed under excessive overhang, and bubble clusters near busbars when vacuum is released before the peroxide cure endotherm is complete. The terminal product type produced from this layup is the framed monofacial glass-backsheet crystalline silicon module, typically in 54-cell residential, 60-cell commercial, and 72-cell utility formats, with power classes from 350 W to 600 W depending on cell size and string count.

    What Changes When the Backsheet Is Replaced by Glass in Bifacial Lamination?

    In a bifacial glass-glass stack, the EVA9110T film functions on both sides of the cell string between two sheets of low-iron glass, eliminating the polyester backsheet and changing moisture egress, edge sealing, and gas removal during cure. The certification envelope includes IEC 61215-1:2021 with MQT 11, MQT 12, and MQT 13, and bifacial current-voltage characterization according to IEC TS 60904-1-2:2019. Construction is tested under IEC 61730-1:2023 for creepage and clearance, and the edge insulation is evaluated after 2.0 mm/2.0 mm symmetrical glass or 2.0 mm/1.6 mm asymmetric glass. The layup uses 0.46 mm EVA on the front side and 0.46 mm EVA on the rear side; total film consumption is approximately 883 g/m² at 0.96 g/cm³, with an additional 5–10 mm of film overhang around the glass perimeter to fill the cell-to-glass edge zone.

    ParameterGlass-backsheet lineGlass-glass line
    Front film caliper0.46 mm0.46 mm
    Rear film caliper0.50 mm0.46 mm
    Film consumption922 g/m²883 g/m²
    Vacuum before membrane pressure0.8–1.0 mbar0.6–0.8 mbar
    Typical cure hold at 150°C10–14 min14–18 min

    Because glass does not breathe through a backsheet, the vacuum profile must have a longer cold evacuation segment before cure; typical multi-chamber laminator settings use a cold vacuum plateau at 60–80°C for 3–4 min, followed by heating at 3.0–3.5°C/min to a platen setpoint of 152°C ±2°C. Membrane pressure is applied only after the cell matrix reaches 142°C to avoid squeezing low-viscosity EVA into the cell gaps and causing rear glass optical distortion. The peroxide cure exotherm, measured by differential scanning calorimetry as an enthalpy of 25–35 J/g across the 130–155°C range, must be exhausted before cooling; therefore, glass-glass modules often receive a hold time 2–4 min longer than equivalent backsheet modules. Laminator platens with a temperature uniformity of ±1.5°C are preferred because the symmetric glass stack has higher thermal mass and any lateral gradient creates uneven gel content near the edges.

    The finished product is a bifacial glass-glass module for fixed-tilt utility arrays, agrivoltaic installations, and carport canopies; rear-side light utilization is quantified by the bifaciality factor under IEC TS 60904-1-2:2019. Published data for EVA9110T in glass-glass bifacial construction is more limited than for conventional glass-backsheet modules, so line validation with a specific laminator and glass type is required before series production.

    For building-integrated photovoltaic curtain wall and spandrel applications, 3M EVA9110T is laminated as the transparent interlayer that simultaneously encapsulates the solar cell matrix and bonds two load-bearing glass panes. The building-regulation envelope is broader than utility module certification: the module must satisfy IEC 63092-1:2020 for building-integrated module requirements, IEC 63092-2:2020 for test methods, IEC 61215-1:2021 for electrical reliability, and, where the laminated glass is overhead or barrier glazing, EN 12600:2002 pendulum impact classification 2B2. Reaction to fire testing follows EN 13501-1:2018 when required by local building codes. The layup commonly uses 6 mm low-iron front glass and 6 mm heat-strengthened rear glass with 0.92 mm of EVA formed by stacking two 0.46 mm films; when a single-sheet 0.76 mm caliper is used, the film weight is approximately 730 g/m² at 0.96 g/cm³. The encapsulant overhang is specified at 3–5 mm from the glass edge before trimming to avoid edge de-airing channels.

    Lamination of large-format BIPV panels at 2.4 m × 1.2 m or 2.8 m × 1.4 m requires a flatbed laminator with a conformable silicone membrane and independent platen zones. The stack is cold-vacuumed to 1.0 mbar for 6–8 min before heating to remove interlayer air at the glass/EVA interface; heating rate is controlled to 2.5–3.0°C/min to avoid glass stress. The cure plateau is held at 148°C for 18–22 min after the module reaches temperature, followed by slow cooling at 1.5°C/min to below 45°C to minimize optical distortion and anisotropic shrinkage at the cell edges. Because BIPV panels have thin edge clearances, edge bleed is removed by CNC trimming rather than mechanical grinding. The terminal product type includes solar spandrel panels, rainscreen cladding modules, and overhead canopy glazing with integrated crystalline cells; these are installed with dry-glazed or structurally bonded curtain wall brackets.

    Building-Applied Metal-Roof Lamination on a Coated Steel Substrate

    When an aluminum-zinc-coated steel panel serves as the rear substrate, the EVA9110T film must bond to a metal surface while compensating for the thermal expansion mismatch between steel at 12 × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹ and glass at 8.5 × 10⁻⁶ K⁻¹. The standards remain IEC 61215-1:2021 and IEC 61730-1:2023, but additional corrosion resistance is verified under ISO 9227:2022 neutral salt spray for the metal rear structure. The layup sequence is 3.2 mm front low-iron glass, 0.46 mm front EVA, cell string, 0.50 mm rear EVA, and a 0.55 mm thick AZ-coated steel substrate; the rear film consumption is 480 g/m² and the front film consumption is 442 g/m². Edge encapsulation requires an 8–10 mm perimeter margin of rear film over the busbars because the metal edge is crimped or folded after lamination in standing-seam profiles.

    The lamination process uses a dual-belt laminator or a flatbed laminator with the metal substrate preheated to 60–70°C to bring the rear substrate closer to the glass temperature ramp before membrane pressure is applied. The chamber is evacuated to 0.8–1.0 mbar for 5 min, then membrane pressure is limited to 0.03 MPa instead of 0.05 MPa to reduce cell microcracking induced by the stiffer metal rear side. Cure is maintained at 150°C for 12–14 min, and the panel is cooled under constrained flatness to below 45°C before unclamping. Batch-to-batch variance in steel coil flatness and adhesion of the EVA to zinc-aluminum coatings are the primary production failure modes; adhesion is typically checked by T-peel on witness coupons in the laminator, with values above 40 N/cm using ASTM D1876.

    The terminal products are building-applied carport canopy modules, standing-seam metal roof modules, and low-slope commercial roof panels. Published data for EVA9110T on zinc-aluminum-coated steel substrates is sparse; pilot laminations with the specific coil finish and primer layer are required before production.

    Small-format solar shingle and tile lamination differs from rectangular module production because the perimeter-to-cell ratio increases and the film must terminate cleanly around complex tile geometry. Compliance for solar shingle and tile products is governed by IEC 61215-1:2021 thermal cycling MQT 11, damp heat MQT 13, and mechanical load MQT 16; safety is assessed under IEC 61730-1:2023; where the product is installed as a roof covering, external fire performance is tested under EN 13501-5:2016 or UL 790 depending on jurisdiction. The layup uses 0.46 mm front EVA, 0.45 mm rear EVA, and 3.2 mm textured front glass; cell coverage is 85–90% of tile area, with an edge margin of 6–8 mm. Film consumption is approximately 437 g/m² for the front layer and 432 g/m² for the rear layer at 0.96 g/cm³. The downstream process uses a tray-based flatbed laminator with machined aluminum or PTFE-coated cavities to contain edge bleed; vacuum is held at 0.9–1.0 mbar for 5 min, heat is raised to 146°C, membrane pressure is applied at 0.04 MPa, and cure is held for 16–18 min before cooling to 50°C. Edge bleed is trimmed by laser or die cutting, and corner void formation and busbar ribbon displacement are the main production defects observed in small-cavity lamination. Terminal products include photovoltaic roof shingles and solar tiles with integrated junction boxes or edge connectors.

    When Vehicle-Integrated Modules Are Laminated on Curved Glazing

    Curved glass in vehicle-integrated photovoltaics imposes non-uniform film tension and edge thinning during lamination; 3M EVA9110T is used as the encapsulation interlayer between a curved front glazing and a thin rear glass or polymer back panel. The test framework combines IEC 61215-1:2021 and IEC 61730-1:2023 with automotive-grade reliability protocols supplied by the vehicle OEM, because no single harmonized PV safety standard covers all vehicle glazing regions. When the laminated panel is within the field of vision of the driver, UN ECE R43 safety-glazing requirements may also apply. The lamination stack comprises 2.1 mm curved low-iron glass, 0.46 mm EVA front, cells, 0.46 mm EVA rear, and 2.0 mm glass or 0.5 mm polycarbonate rear, giving 884 g/m² total EVA consumption for the two-layer stack. A silicone secondary edge seal at 1–2 mm thickness is commonly used to prevent road-moisture ingress.

    Lamination is conducted in a flexible-membrane vacuum bag press or an autoclave-like laminator because conventional flatbed laminators cannot compensate for sag-bent curvature. The vacuum is pulled to 0.9 mbar while the stack is cold, then the assembly is heated at 2.0–2.5°C/min to 138–142°C, a lower setpoint than flat modules to avoid boiling moisture at the glass edges and to accommodate the curved glass thermal gradient. Pressure is ramped to 0.025–0.035 MPa only after the polymer reaches flow temperature; full cure is held for 18–22 min, and cooling is limited to 1.0°C/min to prevent optical double images in the curved lamination. Observed production bottlenecks include cell cracking at the inflection point of the curvature and variable gel content between the apex and edge due to platen shadowing. Terminal products include vehicle-integrated PV roof modules, bus roof panels, and solar sunroofs for recreational vehicles; published data for EVA9110T in curved automotive lamination is limited, so OEM-specific thermal profiles must be validated on the actual pressing equipment.

    Free Quote

    Competitive 3M Solar Encapsulant EVA Film EVA9110T prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.

    For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.

    We will respond to you as soon as possible.

    Tel: +8615380400285

    Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com

    Inquiry

    Get Free Quote of Anhui Liwei Chemical Co., Limited.

    Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!

    Certification & Compliance
    More Introduction

    3M Solar Encapsulant Film EVA9110T is supplied as a fast-cure ethylene-vinyl acetate-based thermosetting film for vacuum lamination of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules. The material is configured as frontside and backside encapsulant layers between low-iron tempered glass and the rear substrate, with cell strings placed between the two encapsulant sheets. Manufacturer documentation identifies standard thicknesses of 0.45 mm and 0.60 mm, standard roll widths up to 1100 mm, and slit widths matched to 60-cell, 72-cell, and half-cut cell layouts. The formulation contains a vinyl acetate copolymer, peroxide thermal initiator, silane coupling agent, and ultraviolet/oxidative stabilizers; proprietary component concentrations are not disclosed. The product is intended for flat-plate crystalline silicon modules and is not specified for thin-film architectures requiring higher-temperature or low-shrinkage encapsulant grades.

    Table 1 consolidates manufacturer-reported specification data for EVA9110T. Cured-state values depend on lamination profile, glass cleaning, backsheet chemistry, and roll storage history; lot-specific certificates of analysis take precedence over tabulated minima when datasheet revisions differ.

    PropertyTest methodSpecification
    ThicknessASTM D3740.45 mm, 0.60 mm ± 10%
    WidthCalibrated linear measurement1100 mm maximum; slit widths 200–1100 mm
    Total luminous transmittance after cureASTM D1003≥91%
    Haze after cureASTM D1003≤5%
    Gel content after laminationBoiling-xylene extraction≥75%
    Peel adhesion to glassASTM D903≥120 N/cm
    Volume resistivityIEC 60093≥1.0 × 1014 Ω·cm
    Water absorptionASTM D570≤0.1%

    Where does the lamination cure window become process-critical?

    Successful lamination of EVA9110T depends on matching peroxide decomposition half-life to the temperature profile of a heated press. Production-scale flat-bed laminators with three-zone heating commonly reach platen setpoints of 145 °C to 155 °C; the cure plateau is normally held for 6–10 min after the encapsulant reaches platen temperature. At platen temperatures below 140 °C, gel content measured by boiling-xylene extraction can remain below 75%, leaving residual flow and a soft encapsulant edge after demolding. At platen temperatures above 160 °C, thermal shrinkage of the film and backsheet relaxation can induce cell displacement and edge void formation. Vacuum staging is typically 30–120 mbar for outgassing, followed by consolidation at 0.6–1.0 bar absolute press pressure in a membrane or pin-type laminator. Cycle-time reduction with EVA9110T is achieved by shortening the peroxide cure plateau; however, thermocouple offset across a 1.5 m × 2.0 m platen can exceed ±3 °C, so the effective gel-content build curve must be confirmed by destructive extraction testing of corner coupons rather than by platen setpoint alone.

    During the melt-flow stage, the viscosity of EVA9110T at lamination temperature falls sufficiently to fill cell gaps and encapsulate collector ribbons without entrapping air. Encapsulant films in this class typically exhibit melt-flow index values in the range 30–50 g/10 min at 190 °C / 2.16 kg when measured per ISO 1133-1:2022; exact product-specific values may vary by batch. Inadequate vacuum or excessive pressing force produces edge voids adjacent to cell corners and along busbar ridges. These voids reduce the insulating cross-section and may act as partial-discharge sites after damp-heat aging. Batch-to-batch variation in peroxide concentration and silane coupling agent means that a shift of 0.05 wt% peroxide can alter gel content by several percentage points under identical lamination time; incoming roll-level cure characterization is therefore advised for automated lines with fixed cycle timers.

    In-line quality control on a lamination line includes temperature profiling at the center and edge of the platen, vacuum leak-rate checks of ±0.5 mbar/min, and periodic gel-content testing of cured corner coupons. Laminators with edge-cooling zones may produce lower gel content at the perimeter; if edge gel content drops below 70%, the encapsulant can remain sticky and collect particulate during trimming.

    During module operation, the cured encapsulant transfers photons to the cell surface while maintaining electrical isolation between string edges and grounded frame or glass. The datasheet transmittance specification of ≥91% per ASTM D1003 applies to the laminated stack; haze values above 5% contribute to scattering losses at low incidence angles. The cured film refractive index is typically 1.48–1.50 at 633 nm, which is below glass and cell anti-reflective coating indices but sufficient to reduce front-glass reflection when index-graded coatings are used. Ultraviolet stabilizers in the encapsulant absorb below approximately 360 nm; this reduces cell degradation from UV exposure but also suppresses a portion of the UV photon current. Yellowness index shifts after 85 °C/85% RH damp heat for 1000 h, as specified in IEC 61215-2, are commonly held to ΔYI ≤2 for this stabilizer class; independent round-robin data for EVA9110T under extended 2000 h exposure is limited.

    Electrical performance is governed by volume resistivity and substrate contamination. The tabulated value of ≥1.0 × 1014 Ω·cm per IEC 60093 supports leakage-current control in standard system voltages, but module-level dielectric withstand is assessed per IEC 61730-2. Dielectric strength for cured EVA encapsulant films typically ranges from 20 kV/mm to 30 kV/mm per ASTM D149; this supports interlayer isolation but must be confirmed on laminated modules. Under negative bias and high humidity, sodium ions from the glass migrate into the EVA matrix and contribute to potential-induced degradation; finished-module testing per IEC 62804 is more indicative than sheet resistivity alone because glass composition, cell antireflective coating, and encapsulant ionic content interact. EVA9110T should not be regarded as a barrier encapsulant; moisture permeation through the film remains higher than polyolefin elastomer alternatives, as shown in Table 2.

    Mechanical load transfer across the encapsulant is characterized by tensile and elongation properties after cure. EVA films in this class typically exhibit tensile strength in the range 15–25 MPa and elongation at break 500–700% when tested per ASTM D638-14; these values support cell-to-glass stress distribution under static and snow load but are not a substitute for module-level mechanical load testing per IEC 61215-2. The crosslinked network also influences indentation resistance and long-term creep at module operating temperatures; at 85 °C, the cured encapsulant is above its glass transition but remains thermoset, so creep is limited compared with uncured film. Published product-specific creep data for EVA9110T under continuous shear is limited.

    If glass and backsheet interfacial adhesion becomes the life-cycle-limiting interface

    Adhesion in EVA9110T is generated through silane coupling to surface hydroxyl groups on glass and through peroxide-induced crosslinking at the backsheet interface. Peel adhesion to glass is specified at ≥120 N/cm using ASTM D903; backsheet adhesion depends on the top layer chemistry and may be specified in the range 80–120 N/cm for polyvinyl fluoride and polyester-based backsheets after corona or plasma treatment. Fluoropolymer surfaces containing residual release agents or low surface energy can reduce wetting and peel strength; a dyne test is often used to verify surface energy above 40 mN/m before layup. Avoid combining EVA9110T with amine-based additives or coatings that buffer the silanol condensation reaction; such combinations can deactivate the coupling agent, accelerate surface crosslinking, and reduce interfacial peel strength. Moisture ingress at the glass edge is the primary adhesion-degradation driver; after damp-heat exposure per IEC 61215-2, peel can fall below 50 N/cm in modules without edge sealant. The glass side is generally more durable than the backsheet side under ultraviolet and damp heat because condensation to the glass surface is more resistant to hydrolysis than adhesion to semi-crystalline backsheet films.

    Property offsets against polyolefin and ionomer encapsulant systems

    EVA-based encapsulants such as EVA9110T differ from polyolefin elastomer films in moisture permeability, acetic acid generation, and sodium-ion transport. Table 2 compares the general property envelope of EVA9110T with POE and ionomer encapsulants reported in photovoltaic literature; the values are not module-specific unless a test standard is cited.

    Encapsulant systemWater vapor transmission at 38 °C, 90% RH per ASTM F1249Acetic acid generation under damp heat 85 °C/85% RHGlass peel stability after 1000 h damp heat per ASTM D903Volume resistivity per IEC 60093
    EVA9110T25–35 g/m²·dayPossible; hydrolysis of vinyl acetate≥100 N/cm when edge sealed≥1.0 × 1014 Ω·cm
    POE2–4 g/m²·dayNone from the same ester hydrolysis pathway≥80 N/cm after primer≥1.0 × 1015 Ω·cm
    Ionomer3–5 g/m²·dayNone from the same ester hydrolysis pathway≥100 N/cm after lamination≥1.0 × 1014 Ω·cm

    The principal technical consequence of selecting EVA9110T over a POE encapsulant is the retention and release of acetic acid under damp heat. Acetic acid is produced by hydrolysis of the vinyl acetate comonomer; the rate increases with temperature and water activity. Under the same exposure, POE and ionomer encapsulants do not generate acetic acid from the same ester hydrolysis pathway. However, EVA9110T can be processed at lower lamination pressure than some ionomer films and achieves direct glass adhesion without a primer; these trade-offs are evaluated in terms of module warranties and installation environment rather than as a single property rank.

    Roll handling and slitting impose further boundary conditions. EVA9110T rolls should be stored below 30 °C and protected from ultraviolet light; peroxide-containing encapsulant films are susceptible to low-temperature crosslinking if stored above 35 °C or exposed to localized heat from stretch-wrap machinery. At relative humidity above 60%, pre-drying of the film may be required to prevent lamination bubbles and haze. Slitting tolerances for automated layup are commonly held at ±0.5 mm on width and ±1 mm on length; misalignment beyond 2 mm can expose cell edges or create backsheet seal voids. Incoming quality control typically includes gel content, thickness profile, peel adhesion to float glass, and visual inspection for gel particles and edge damage.

    Thermal, moisture, and bias-induced degradation pathways in fielded modules

    In fielded modules, the dominant encapsulant-related degradation pathways are acetic acid formation, moisture ingress, and bias-driven ion migration. Acetic acid released from EVA hydrolysis can lower interfacial pH and accelerate corrosion of solder, bus ribbon, and cell metallization; series resistance then increases under prolonged damp heat. The reaction follows a temperature- and water-activity-dependent hydrolysis pathway, and accelerated test data per IEC 61215-2 at 85 °C/85% RH may not fully reproduce coastal nighttime condensation cycles. EVA9110T is not specified for use with narrow-gap back-contact cells where acetic acid corrosion of conductive paste is particularly sensitive; published data for this specific configuration is limited. The film should not be combined with amine-containing edge sealants or low-molecular-weight polyamide backsheet coatings that can deactivate the silane coupling agent during lamination. Under potential-induced degradation stress per IEC 62804, module-level tests rather than sheet resistivity alone determine suitability, because glass composition, cell antireflective coating, and encapsulant film all contribute to sodium migration kinetics.