| HS Code | 102515 |
| Chemical Name | Polyvinyl Alcohol |
| Hydrophilicity | High hydrophilicity due to hydroxyl groups |
| Water Solubility | Soluble in water; solubility depends on hydrolysis degree and temperature |
| Biocompatibility | Biocompatible and non-cytotoxic for wound contact |
| Film Forming Ability | Excellent film-forming ability producing uniform thin films |
| Tensile Strength | Good tensile strength for durable wound dressing films |
| Flexibility | Flexible and conformable to skin surfaces |
| Moisture Vapor Transmission Rate | Sufficiently high MVTR to maintain moist wound environment |
| Oxygen Permeability | Moderate to high oxygen transmission to support wound respiration |
| Transparency | Transparent films allow visual inspection of wound bed |
| Biodegradability | Biodegradable under environmental or enzymatic conditions |
| Swelling Ratio | High swelling capacity absorbing wound exudate |
| Non Toxicity | Non-toxic and non-irritating to tissue |
| Adhesion Property | Mild adhesive when hydrated; can adhere to moist wound surfaces |
As an accredited Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) for Wound Dressings (Medical Films) factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | Sterile PVA wound dressing films, 10 cm x 10 cm, supplied as 25 sheets per moisture-barrier box for medical use. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL safely loads packaged Polyvinyl Alcohol medical films, ensuring sterile, moisture-protected transport for wound dressing use. |
| Shipping | Ship Polyvinyl Alcohol (Medical Films) as non-hazardous material in sealed polyethylene-lined bags or sealed drums to protect against moisture. Store at room temperature, away from humidity. Ensure packaging is labeled for medical-grade use and compliant with transportation regulations. Avoid exposure to water during transit. |
| Storage | Store Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) wound dressing films in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area at controlled room temperature (15–30°C), away from direct sunlight, moisture, and heat sources. Keep in original sealed packaging until use to prevent hydration, deformation, or microbial contamination. Avoid excessive humidity and freezing. Follow manufacturer’s stated shelf life. |
| Shelf Life | Shelf life typically 2–3 years when stored in a cool, dry, sealed container away from moisture and direct sunlight. |
| Crosslinking Method | Gel Fraction (%)(ASTM D2765 extractables test) | Equilibrium Swelling Ratio(gravimetric, phosphate-buffered saline) | Tensile Strength (MPa)(ASTM D882) | Processing Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freeze-thaw 3 cycles | 45–60 | 8.0–12.0 | 0.2–0.4 | Long cycle time; crystallinity sensitive to cooling rate |
| Freeze-thaw 5 cycles | 65–80 | 5.0–8.0 | 0.6–1.0 | Reduced elongation; potential edge shrinkage |
| Glutaraldehyde 0.2 wt% | 85–95 | 3.5–6.0 | 1.2–2.5 | Requires exhaustive aldehyde removal; pH-dependent reaction rate |
| Gamma irradiation 25 kGy | 70–85 | 4.0–7.0 | 0.8–1.8 | Radiolytic chain scission reduces molecular weight; dose mapping critical |
| Standard | Title / Test Focus | Typical Acceptance Criterion for PVA-Based Dressings |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 10993-5 | Biological evaluation – In vitro cytotoxicity | Cell viability ≥ 70% by MTT assay on L929 fibroblasts |
| ISO 10993-10 | Tests for skin sensitisation, irritation, and intracutaneous reactivity | Primary irritation index < 0.4; no erythema/oedema grade > 1 |
| EN 13726-1 | Test methods for primary wound dressings – Aspects of absorbency and MVTR | Free swell absorptive capacity ≥ 150%; MVTR range defined per product claim |
| EN 13726-3 | Wearability and comfort – Water vapour permeability in contact with skin | Break force ≥ 5 N/25 mm for hydrated films |
| ASTM F2100-11 | Standard specification for performance of materials used in medical face masks (fluid resistance, bacterial filtration applicable to dressings) | Synthetic blood penetration at 160 mmHg (≥ 120 mmHg for Level 2) |
| ISO 11137-1 | Sterilisation of health care products – Radiation | Sterility assurance level 10⁻⁶; dose established per bioburden |
| ISO 13485 | Quality management systems for medical devices | Process validation for all critical manufacturing steps |
| USP <87> | Biological reactivity tests, in vitro (Cytotoxicity) | Grade ≤ 2 (mild reactivity) under agarose overlay |
Competitive Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) for Wound Dressings (Medical Films) prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8615380400285 or mail to sales2@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8615380400285
Email: sales2@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
Managing exudate in partial-thickness burns demands a dressing that can absorb up to 5–7 g/g of wound fluid while maintaining a moist interface without maceration of the peri-wound skin. Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) films, cast from aqueous solutions, provide a transparent, conformable barrier that meets these requirements through a combination of high water uptake and controlled moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR). Unlike solvent-based coatings, the water-based casting process eliminates cytotoxic residual solvents, aligning with ISO 10993-5:2009 cytotoxicity criteria (elution test, L929 cells, viability > 70%). The oxygen permeability of an unplasticised PVA film at 23°C and 50% RH is approximately 0.5–1.5 cm³·mm/(m²·day·atm) per ASTM D3985, sufficiently low to prevent desiccation yet not so low as to promote anaerobiosis. PVA achieves these properties without requiring plasticisers that could leach and irritate wound tissue, because partial hydrolysis introduces molecular irregularities that reduce crystallinity and confer intrinsic flexibility.
PVA grades suitable for solvent-cast medical films typically exhibit a degree of hydrolysis between 98.0 and 99.8 mol% (fully hydrolysed) for maximum crystallinity and mechanical integrity, while partially hydrolysed grades (87–89 mol%) offer faster dissolution and reduced stiffness. The 4% aqueous solution viscosity at 20°C ranges from 4.5 to 6.5 mPa·s for low‑molecular‑weight types (e.g., PVA‑105, approximate Mw 22,000–31,000 g/mol) and 25–30 mPa·s for medium‑viscosity grades (PVA‑117, Mw 75,000–95,000 g/mol by SEC‑MALS). Residual acetyl content below 2.0 mol% limits water sensitivity while preserving sufficient interfacial interaction for secondary dressing adhesion. These specifications correspond with the Ph. Eur. monograph 01/2023:1163 for poly(vinyl alcohol) as a pharmaceutical excipient. In practice, fully hydrolysed grades are preferred for films requiring high wet strength; however, their tendency to form crystalline domains during drying can lead to brittle failure if the film thickness exceeds 100 μm. For transparent, flexible films under 75 μm, formulators often blend a high‑hydrolysis grade with a small fraction of partially hydrolysed PVA to disrupt crystallinity without sacrificing water resistance.
The conversion of PVA solution to a uniform medical film relies on slot‑die coating onto a siliconised polyester release liner. A dope of 10–15 wt% PVA in deionised water is prepared at 85–95°C under low‑shear mechanical agitation for 30–60 minutes. The solution is passed through a 5 μm absolute‑rated filter capsule and degassed under −0.8 bar vacuum. A slot‑die coater equipped with a 150 mm-wide die and a high‑precision syringe pump (e.g., TSE Troller or equivalent closed‑loop system) delivers a wet film at a gap of 200–400 μm and a coating speed of 1–3 m/min, yielding a wet thickness of 250–500 μm. Drying in a multi‑zone forced‑air oven with temperature ramping from 60°C to 110°C over 15–20 minutes reduces residual moisture to ≤5 wt%, monitored by Karl Fischer titration (ASTM D6869). Films produced in this manner exhibit thickness uniformity within ±5% as measured by a non‑contact laser gauge, critical for consistent MVTR and fluid handling. Any deviation from the drying profile that leaves moisture above 8 wt% leads to blocking on the roll and necessitates re‑drying; conversely, overdrying above 130°C can induce thermally activated crosslinking between hydroxyls, altering solubility and potentially affecting subsequent crosslinking steps.
Uncrosslinked PVA films remain water‑soluble and lose integrity within minutes of wound exudate contact, so chemical or physical crosslinking is mandatory. Glutaraldehyde at 0.5% v/v in 0.1 M HCl/ethanol provides rapid acetal crosslinks, but residual aldehyde must be reduced below 50 ppm (HPLC with UV detection at 365 nm after DNPH derivatisation) to satisfy ISO 10993‑5 cytotoxicity limits; extended washing in glycine‑buffered water for 48 h is typical. An alternative, citric acid combined with sodium hypophosphite catalyst (0.5 wt% on PVA) and heat curing at 140°C for 5 minutes produces ester crosslinks with no leachable toxic residuals, achieving gel fractions above 85% (gravimetric after 24 h water extraction). Physical crosslinking via repeated freeze‑thaw cycles in a programmable chamber (−20°C for 8 h, +25°C for 4 h) forms crystallite‑based junction zones, yielding cryogel films with an exceptional fluid absorption capacity of 12–15 g/g (EN 13726‑1, free swell). The mechanical properties after crosslinking are assessed by ASTM D882 (tensile, 500 mm/min): glutaraldehyde‑crosslinked films typically show ultimate tensile strength of 25–35 MPa at 200–300% elongation, while freeze‑thaw cryogels exhibit lower strength (15–22 MPa) but higher elongation (350–500%). Selection must balance mechanical robustness against the risk of chemical sensitisation; for paediatric or chronic wounds, physical crosslinking is favoured despite longer processing time.
Comparative evaluation of transparent wound dressing films according to EN 13726‑1 free swell absorptive capacity and ASTM D882 tensile properties reveals distinct performance clusters that guide product selection for wound types. PVA films occupy a unique space: they absorb several times their weight in fluid while remaining transparent and non‑adherent to the wound bed, unlike hydrocolloids that become opaque and leave residue. The oxygen and water vapour transmission rates of PVA can be engineered by adjusting crystallinity and thickness; polyurethane films, by contrast, provide higher MVTR (> 2000 g/m²/24h per ASTM E96, upright cup) but negligible fluid absorption, making them less suitable for moderate to heavy exudate unless combined with an absorbent pad. Alginate dressings offer high absorbency but are opaque, forming a gel that can obscure wound visualisation and require a secondary dressing. Chitosan films possess intrinsic haemostatic and antimicrobial activity but exhibit low wet‑state tensile strength (5–12 MPa) that limits their use on mobile anatomical sites. The matrix below summarises key metrics for common dressing film materials, with all values obtained under controlled laboratory conditions at 23 ± 2°C and 50 ± 5% RH.
| Material Film | Free Swell Absorptive Capacity (g/g) EN 13726‑1 | Tensile Strength (MPa) ASTM D882 | Elongation at Break (%) ASTM D882 | MVTR (g/m²/24h) ASTM E96 (upright) | Transparency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVA (freeze‑thaw cryogel, 100 μm) | 12–15 | 15–22 | 350–500 | 800–1200 | High |
| PVA (glutaraldehyde‑crosslinked, 80 μm) | 3–5 | 25–35 | 200–300 | 600–900 | High |
| Calcium alginate (non‑woven, 2 mm) | 15–20 | not applicable | — | 1500–2000 | Opaque |
| Chitosan (solvent‑cast, 60 μm) | 4–8 | 8–15 | 6–15 | 1200–1600 | Translucent |
| Polyurethane (ether‑type, 25 μm) | 0.5–1.0 | 30–50 | 400–600 | 2000–2500 | High |
| Hydrocolloid (CMC/gelatin, 1 mm) | 6–10 | not a film | — | 400–800 | Opaque |
The functional response of PVA wound films is inseparably linked to the resin’s degree of polymerisation and hydrolysis. Producers targeting rapid dissolution for in‑situ gelling applications select low‑viscosity, partially hydrolysed grades, while those requiring durable, free‑standing films choose fully hydrolysed, medium‑viscosity types. The table below lists commercial PVA grades commonly evaluated in medical film development, with typical specifications derived from manufacturer certificates of analysis and compendial monographs. All viscosity data correspond to 4% aqueous solutions at 20°C (Brookfield LV, spindle 1, 60 rpm).
| Grade Designation | Degree of Hydrolysis (mol%) | Viscosity (mPa·s) | Weight‑average Mw (g/mol) | Typical Medical Film Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVA‑103 | 98.0–99.0 | 3.5–4.5 | 13,000–20,000 | Spray‑on barrier, in‑situ gel |
| PVA‑105 | 98.0–99.0 | 5.0–6.0 | 22,000–31,000 | Transparent primary film (< 50 µm) |
| PVA‑117 | 98.0–99.0 | 25.0–30.0 | 75,000–95,000 | Free‑standing cryogel, high absorbency |
| PVA‑205 (partial) | 87.0–89.0 | 5.0–6.0 | 22,000–31,000 | Flexible co‑film additive, lower stiffness |
| PVA‑224 (partial) | 87.0–89.0 | 40.0–48.0 | 100,000–120,000 | Adhesive‑backed overlay film |
In donor site wounds, where fluid loss is high and bacterial barrier essential, a PVA film of thickness 80–120 μm crosslinked by two freeze‑thaw cycles (−20°C for 8 h, +25°C for 4 h) delivers an absorptive capacity of 12–15 g/g (EN 13726‑1, free swell) and a tensile strength exceeding 18 MPa (ASTM D882). The film’s MVTR, measured by upright cup method (ASTM E96, 23°C, 50% RH), averages 900–1100 g/m²/24h, maintaining a moist wound environment while preventing fluid pooling. The dressing remains transparent throughout the wear time of up to 72 hours, allowing clinicians to monitor healing without disruption. A limitation of physically crosslinked PVA cryogels is their susceptibility to drying‑out if left uncovered; hence they are typically overlaid with a polyurethane film that provides a moisture vapour‑permeable, waterproof top layer. Published data for this specific donor site configuration remains limited, but bench‑top fluid handling models (EN 13726‑3) suggest that the composite dressing maintains an interface humidity of 85–95% RH, conducive to epithelialisation. In contrast, calcium alginate dressings would gel and require a secondary securement, obscuring the wound bed and increasing the risk of periwound maceration from lateral wicking.